<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best In Film: 1976</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/2006/08/12/best-in-film-1976/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/2006/08/12/best-in-film-1976/</link>
	<description>Movie reviews, features, and top ten lists.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mazur</title>
		<link>http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/2006/08/12/best-in-film-1976/#comment-3098</link>
		<dc:creator>mazur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinephilemagazine.com/?p=160#comment-3098</guid>
		<description>I like the list (and your site a lot) but I think both "Assault..." and "Carrie" should be lower down, and Network higher up (4 or 5 perhaps). I also think "The Killing of Chinese Bookie" (one of my favorites and a truely underappreciated Cassavetes film) should certainly be in the top ten.

You lists beg the question of how to rank films; cultural/cinematic importance, aesthetic or acting value, personal impact, etc. Would you talk a little bit about the criteria you use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the list (and your site a lot) but I think both &#8220;Assault&#8230;&#8221; and &#8220;Carrie&#8221; should be lower down, and Network higher up (4 or 5 perhaps). I also think &#8220;The Killing of Chinese Bookie&#8221; (one of my favorites and a truely underappreciated Cassavetes film) should certainly be in the top ten.</p>
<p>You lists beg the question of how to rank films; cultural/cinematic importance, aesthetic or acting value, personal impact, etc. Would you talk a little bit about the criteria you use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.175 seconds -->
