<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best In Film: 1985</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/2006/06/07/best-in-film-1985/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/2006/06/07/best-in-film-1985/</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews, Features, and home of the Cinephile Spoilers Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard X</title>
		<link>http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/2006/06/07/best-in-film-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 18:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/?p=127#comment-179</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree with you more. At first, when I was younger, I thought part II was better, but how can you argue with the first one? It&#039;s a classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more. At first, when I was younger, I thought part II was better, but how can you argue with the first one? It&#8217;s a classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arden</title>
		<link>http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/2006/06/07/best-in-film-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Arden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 18:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/?p=127#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Back to the Future is easily one of the best films ever made.  I watch it on average five times a month.  If I were stranded on a desert island and could only bring one movie, it would be Back to the Future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to the Future is easily one of the best films ever made.  I watch it on average five times a month.  If I were stranded on a desert island and could only bring one movie, it would be Back to the Future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard X</title>
		<link>http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/2006/06/07/best-in-film-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/?p=127#comment-111</guid>
		<description>I noticed that a couple of days ago as well. Because Woody Allen releases a new movie every year, it&#039;s only a matter of time before a bunch of his movies make it onto the year-end lists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that a couple of days ago as well. Because Woody Allen releases a new movie every year, it&#8217;s only a matter of time before a bunch of his movies make it onto the year-end lists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SS</title>
		<link>http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/2006/06/07/best-in-film-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>SS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 17:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/?p=127#comment-110</guid>
		<description>I think you have a Woody Allen film on every list so far! Good choice with Back to the Future. True classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have a Woody Allen film on every list so far! Good choice with Back to the Future. True classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.258 seconds -->
