<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best In Film: 2004</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/2006/05/12/best-in-film-2004/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/2006/05/12/best-in-film-2004/</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews, Features, and home of the Cinephile Spoilers Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SS</title>
		<link>http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/2006/05/12/best-in-film-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>SS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 17:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinephilemagazine.com/?p=101#comment-83</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good think you explained yourself for Fahrenheit and Passion...I was going to come over there and slap you. But I understand your logic. I can&#039;t believe you put Man on Fire there...let the debates begin. Come on Andy, I know you loved it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good think you explained yourself for Fahrenheit and Passion&#8230;I was going to come over there and slap you. But I understand your logic. I can&#8217;t believe you put Man on Fire there&#8230;let the debates begin. Come on Andy, I know you loved it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.245 seconds -->
